Services

Modular services that can be delivered individually, but create the greatest value when combined into a structured quantum readiness programme.

Most organisations do not need to start with full remediation. They need to start by understanding where cryptography exists, what data it protects, what is most exposed, and how long a safe transition will take.

Our services can be delivered independently. However, for most organisations they work best as a staged, end-to-end programme. Quantum risk is interconnected, and bundling discovery, assessment, prioritisation and transition planning usually reduces rework, improves sequencing and creates a clearer path to action.

Discovery and cryptographic inventory service icon

Discovery and cryptographic inventory

Identify where traditional asymmetric cryptography is used across applications, APIs, certificates, signing flows, cloud platforms, network paths and third-party services.

  • Current-state cryptographic inventory across key systems and services
  • Initial dependency map covering applications, APIs, certificates and vendors
  • Visibility into externally exposed and business-critical cryptographic touchpoints
  • Documented view of likely blind spots requiring deeper validation
  • Foundation dataset for risk analysis and transition planning

Approximate duration: 4 to 8 weeks, depending on organisation size and complexity.

Can be delivered independently, or as part of a broader quantum readiness programme.

Risk assessment and exposure analysis service icon

Risk assessment and exposure analysis

Assess data sensitivity, long-life confidentiality risk, business criticality, external exposure and the likely impact of delayed transition.

  • Initial risk profile by platform, application and data type
  • Identification of long-life sensitive data at highest future exposure
  • View of operational, regulatory and reputational consequences
  • Early understanding of harvest now, decrypt later exposure
  • Management-ready summary of priority risk themes

Approximate duration: 3 to 6 weeks, depending on organisation size and complexity.

Can be delivered independently, or as part of a broader quantum readiness programme.

Roadmap and prioritisation service icon

Roadmap and prioritisation

Create a sequenced plan based on system importance, change complexity, lifecycle constraints, vendor dependencies and organisational risk tolerance.

  • Prioritised list of systems and domains for action
  • High-level transition sequence across near, medium and longer term
  • Indicative phasing based on complexity and dependencies
  • Clear rationale for what should move first and why
  • Board and leadership-ready roadmap for investment decisions

Approximate duration: 2 to 4 weeks, depending on organisation size and complexity.

Can be delivered independently, or as part of a broader quantum readiness programme.

Transition planning and crypto agility service icon

Transition planning and crypto agility

Support architecture and planning decisions that improve crypto agility and prepare systems for the adoption of post-quantum standards over time.

  • Crypto-agility design principles for future change
  • Transition options for applications, APIs, certificates and integrations
  • Architecture guidance for introducing new approved algorithms safely
  • Testing, rollback and staged release considerations
  • Practical view of where vendor engagement or platform change is needed

Approximate duration: 4 to 10 weeks, depending on organisation size and complexity.

Can be delivered independently, or as part of a broader quantum readiness programme.

Monitoring and governance service icon

Monitoring and governance

Track standards updates, vendor readiness, implementation progress and residual risk once the organisation has started its transition.

  • Governance checkpoints for milestones, dependencies and decisions
  • Tracking model for standards, vendor readiness and residual risk
  • Simple reporting view for leadership and steering forums
  • Mechanism to keep inventory and roadmap current over time
  • Ongoing alignment with Australian regulatory and security guidance

Approximate duration: 2 to 6 weeks to establish, depending on organisation size and complexity.

Can be delivered independently, or as part of a broader quantum readiness programme.

Executive and stakeholder education service icon

Executive and stakeholder education

Provide leadership, architecture, cyber and delivery teams with a structured understanding of quantum risk, business drivers, milestones and realistic transition expectations.

  • Leadership briefing tailored to the Australian enterprise context
  • Common language across cyber, architecture, engineering and risk teams
  • Improved awareness of timelines, dependencies and constraints
  • Working understanding of what post-quantum transition involves
  • Better organisational readiness to sponsor, sequence and govern change

Approximate duration: 1 to 2 weeks, depending on organisation size and complexity.

Can be delivered independently, or as part of a broader quantum readiness programme.

Typical engagement approach

While services can be delivered individually, most organisations follow a staged approach to reduce risk, avoid rework and build a practical pathway towards quantum-safe cryptography.

Phase 1

Discovery

Identify where cryptography exists and what data, systems and services it protects.

Phase 2

Risk and prioritisation

Assess exposure and determine what matters most based on sensitivity, impact and timing.

Phase 3

Transition planning

Define a practical roadmap to quantum-safe encryption across applications, infrastructure and vendors.

Start anywhere, but most organisations begin with discovery so they can understand their exposure before committing to a broader transition programme.

Where most organisations start

If the goal is to reduce uncertainty quickly, discovery and assessment are the best entry points. They provide the visibility needed to brief leadership, shape investment decisions and avoid starting remediation without a clear view of what is actually at risk.